Like nonprofits everywhere, Northern California nonprofit agencies need the information contained in a large and robust compensation and benefits survey. Unfortunately, national surveys are of little use, because they do not take local differences into account.
73% of the 2016 Northern California survey's participants see hiring challenges in the year ahead, and they foresee increased competition from their colleagues and businesses to attract and retain the "best and brightest" employees.
Your organization will need the wealth of information produced by the 2017 survey to compete effectively on this ever-changing playing field, including invaluable information about compensation, base pay, employee benefits, salary increases, personnel policies, as well as data that larger nonprofits can use to justify to the IRS the compensation they pay their executive employees.
Northern California nonprofits will also need help in combating the related challenge of high employee turnover. In 2016, the Northern California survey reported a 18% turnover rate for full-time employees and a 21% rate for part-time employees. The wasted expenses for job recruitment and training caused by employee turnover reduce the amount of dollars a nonprofit can spend on much-needed direct services. High-quality data about compensation and benefits allow Northern California nonprofits to make decisions that can limit these expenses.
The "best survey of its kind" helps nonprofits in Northern California
A high percentage of jobs that nonprofits fill are best compared with others in their own economic community, with benefits being compared similarly. National surveys, even when broken down into large regions (e.g., "the eastern seaboard", "the southeast"), are almost worthless because they do not take local differences into account.
Regional compensation and benefits surveys provide the best information possible to their nonprofit participants because the comparisons are not with organizations hundreds of miles away, but agencies in their own community. Great examples include surveys in Southern California, Metro Seattle, Metro Chicago, New York City, Metro Kansas City, Metro Washington D.C., Southwest Pennsylvania, Central Florida, Northeast Florida and Southern New England.
More than 200 positions are reported for the entire sample, with more details by:
Specific data regarding incentive pay is also reported for each position, including eligibility for incentive pay and actual incentive pay given.
Benefits and other policies are reported as well:
The survey was initiated in 1978 by our late colleague, Barbara Schilling, at The Management Center (TMC) in San Francisco. TMC published it annually until they went out of business in 2004. From 2004 to 2009, it was compiled by Rita Haronian under contract with the Center for Nonprofit Management (CNM) in Southern California. 2010 was the first year it was produced by Nonprofit Compensation Associates.